Senior Palestinian politicians call for statehood under international guardianship

Fatah considers negotiations as “clinically dead”

Abbas calls for peace in Mideast region

Reconciliation among Palestinian factions postponed

With Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations in limbo over a dispute regarding settlement expansion, Palestinians are starting to think out loud about possible alternatives to peace talks.

After investing all of his political capital in talks with Israel, what would President Mahmoud Abbas and his Palestinian Authority (PA) do if he concludes there's no chance for a deal with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu?

Scenarios range from a new armed uprising against Israel, to a dissolution of the PA, to a renewed drive for a unity government with Hamas – all of which would ratchet up uncertainty in the Middle East and complicate efforts to resume talks.

But the most likely alternative appears to be a diplomatic campaign seeking recognition of a Palestinian state by the United Nations Security Council.

Though the Palestinian leadership still hopes the US can broker a renewal of talks, "It's a legitimate question to ask: 'What if this doesn't work,' " says Ghassan Khatib, a spokesman for the Palestinian government in the West Bank.

"If this fails, why don't we look into direct support by the international community to establish this state?"

A political appeal to the United Nations on statehood has the potential to deepen Israel's growing isolation, especially if the Obama administration wanted to reprimand Jerusalem for not agreeing to an extension of its moratorium on settlement building in the West Bank.

The Palestinians would have to choose whether to seek a mainly declarative resolution on future statehood or a more far-reaching legal decision unilaterally imposing a final-status solution on Israel and the Palestinians.

In a strategy paper from December 2009, a team led by Palestinian Negotiator Saeb Erekat wrote that Palestinians could also seek Security Council endorsement for the parameters of an eventual deal – such as identifying the 1967 border as a basis for a territorial compromise. The paper called this "a more likely option'' than an imposed solution.

UN endorsement of the Arab League peace initiative offering a full normalization with Israel in return for a full withdrawal from occupied lands is yet another option.

Last week in Egypt, Palestinian negotiator Ahmed Qurei declared that "all the options are open to us," including "armed resistance" and reconciling a three-year rift with the Hamas government in Gaza, the Jerusalem Post reported. He also mentioned the possibility of UN recognition of a unilateral Palestinian declaration of statehood.

Many Palestinians have also discussed the possibility of promoting one Arab-Jewish state, an entity in which Palestinians would enjoy a majority eventually. But some proponents concede it is merely a tactic to create urgency for a two-state solution.

"By supporting such an outcome it will be a jolt to Israelis to wake up and realize that it's high time to create a Palestinian state," says Hanna Sinora, the co-president of the Israel Palestinian Center for Research and Information.

On Wednesday, the International Criminal Court at the Hague was expected to consider Palestinian appeals to file petitions.

Because such a right is reserved for sovereign countries, an ICC decision in favor of the measure could be seen as an initial victory for Palestinian recognition by a major international body.

Speculation about a push at the UN has not been lost on the Israeli government.

"Since the Palestinians talk about so much, we take it seriously," says an Israeli official who requested anonymity.

Israel is less concerned about the possibility of a UN legal ruling on statehood, since it would require a unilateral demarcation of a border with Israel and a resolution of the competing claims between rival Palestinian governments in Gaza and the West Bank. Thus, in Israel's view, it is less likely to win approval from the UN Security Council. What's more, Israel hasn't noticed any Palestinian diplomatic preparation for a push, according to the official.

And yet, a political declaration by the UN "will have no legal meaning but it will be a powerful statement,'' the Israeli official says, adding that it would not do "a lot of good.... It won't change realities on the ground, but politically it will be an unpleasant moment.''

The Palestinians have suspended the negotiations started in September in Washington, saying Israel's refusal to extend a 10-month moratorium on settlement expansion in the West Bank demonstrates it is not serious about talks.

Last week, the Arab League endorsed the Palestinian move but gave the Obama administration additional time to resuscitate the talks.

A diplomatic time-out in the final few weeks before US mid-term elections, however, has kicked up speculation about a breakdown in talks and a drive at the UN against Israel.

"Israel's diplomacy has reached a turning point,'' wrote political columnist Aluf Ben in the liberal Haaretz newspaper.

"Instead of dealing with the failed direct talks, from this point Israel will be orchestrating a diplomatic holding action against the Palestinian initiative to have the UN Security Council recognize Palestinian independence within the 1967 borders.''

To be sure, some observers caution that the "day after'' a breakdown may be months away, and that UN acceptance of Palestinian statehood is far from assured. The US, a strong ally of Israel, is one of five veto-wielding members on the UN Security Council.

"I don't think that members of the permanent five [Security Council members] would allow it to pass because they don't think its the best way to bring about Palestinian statehood,'' says a Western diplomat who requested to remain anonymous.

"Most sensible people believe that a negotiating process is the best way. It would produce the least troublesome and the least traumatic solution in terms of violence. And the negotiating process is far from exhausted.''

A Palestinian drive for international recognition for statehood would likely signal the failure of the latest US mediation effort.

"It will be proof that the efforts collapsed. At this moment, although there is no movement, everybody thinks it is alive, and any day it can pop up with a breakthrough,'' says Alon Liel, a former Israeli foreign ministry director general.

"If they succeed in embarrassing Israel, especially if the US is indifferent or abstaining, it will be an unbelievable blow.''

Meanwhile, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Wednesday met with the International Elders Group and discussed with them the stalled peace process and achieving the inter-Palestinian reconciliation.

Palestinian negotiator Nabil Shaath told a joint news conference after the meeting, which was held in the West Bank city of Ramallah, that Abbas briefed the elders' delegation on the latest developments related to the stalled peace process with Israel.

The delegation included former Irish President Mary Robinson, former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, and two others.

Shaath said that the delegation backed the Palestinian stance that called for halting the Jewish settlement and ending Gaza blockade.

Meanwhile, Carter told reporters that the question of reconciliation between Abbas's Fatah party and its rival Islamic Hamas movement "was also discussed with Abbas and was discussed earlier with the Egyptians."

Robinson also told reporters that the delegation visited the Gaza Strip, Syria, Egypt, Jordan and West Bank, adding that the delegation will also visit East Jerusalem and will meet with Palestinians living in Israel.

Asked about if a prisoners' swap deal between Hamas and Israel is imminent, Robinson said that the delegation discussed the issue with Hamas in both Gaza and Damascus.

"Hamas leaders told us that they hope they finalize the deal as immediate as possible, but they said that the problem is at the Israeli side," she said.

Carter had earlier told a news conference in Damascus that " Hamas must be part of the current peace process," expressing that the efforts exerted by the United States to achieve peace "are not so far active."

The Islamist Hamas movement which rules Gaza said planned reconciliation talks with the Fatah faction of Palestinian President Abbas have been postponed due to a spat over the venue.

"Fatah has asked to be excused from taking part in the meeting which had been due to take place in Damascus tomorrow (Wednesday)," said a Hamas statement released in the Syrian capital where the group has its base in exile. "Contacts will be made between the two sides to arrange a new date."

A Fatah source in the West Bank town of Ramallah where Abbas has his base said that the faction had asked that the talks be held "anywhere but Damascus" but that Hamas had refused.

Arabic press reports said that the Fatah request followed a row between Abbas and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad at an Arab summit in Libya earlier this month over policy towards peace talks with Israel after its refusal to renew restrictions on Jewish settlement construction in the occupied West Bank.

Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhum confirmed that the movement had rejected a Fatah request for a change of venue.

"Fatah asked for the meeting to be moved from Damascus, something which was neither justified nor acceptable," Barhum told AFP in Gaza.

"We condemn Fatah's insistence on a change of venue, which goes against what we agreed at the last meeting in Damascus, which was that the next meeting should be held in the same place."

Exiled Hamas political chief Khaled Meshaal had described last month's talks as "serious."

But since then, Abbas's security forces have been arresting militants in the West Bank, prompting an angry response from Hamas military commanders and other armed groups.

"If Palestinian reconciliation is not able to prevent Fatah from taking these aggressive actions against the resistance, then no one will blame us if we target its leaders wherever they are," Abu Obeida, spokesman for the military wing of Hamas, said earlier this month.

Long-standing divisions between the two factions boiled over in June 2007 when Hamas seized power in Gaza after a week of fierce street battles, confining Abbas's Palestinian Authority to the occupied West Bank.

Since then, each side has accused the other of arresting and mistreating scores of its supporters, and in recent months Hamas has strongly criticized the Authority's security cooperation with Israel in the West Bank.

The two movements struggled for months to reach a unity agreement through Egyptian mediation but those efforts came to a halt in October 2009 when Hamas refused to sign an agreement endorsed by Egypt and Fatah.